Suhail Rizwan
0

Former Pakistan captain Imran Khan has come out in support of Shahid Afridi, saying the allrounder should be given a long run as captain to avoid the destabilising effect of frequent changes at the top.

"Since I retired in 1992, Australia has had only three captains while Pakistan has had more than two dozen and that is why there is a big difference between Pakistan and AustraliShahid Afridi at the Gaddafi Stadium on the day of his appointment as captain, Lahore, May 25, 2010a," Imran told AFP.

According to Imran, Afridi was the logical choice to lead Pakistan as he is already the Twenty20 captain. "Who else if not Afridi?" Imran said. "I think if they had made anyone else captain, problems would surely have persisted, so I think Afridi was the best choice available."

Imran said Afridi has to be given time if he is to develop into a good leader. "Afridi has been leading the team well in the Twenty20 format. A good captain should be brave, can handle pressure and should have the respect of the team, so let us give Afridi some time to settle and then judge him.

"You can never predict about him as a Test player and a captain until you give him a chance. If he was not playing Tests and now he intends to play, then maybe with responShahid Afridi at the Gaddafi Stadium on the day of his appointment as captain, Lahore, May 25, 2010sibility he performs better."

Pakistan's current captaincy crisis was precipitated by Younis Khan's resignation and the sacking of Mohammad Yousuf. The PCB then appointed Afridi to lead the team during the World Twenty20 and earlier this week made him captain for the Asia Cup next month and the subsequent tour to England.

Khan also said he is in favour of having having one captain for all formats of the game. "Cricket is the only sport where you need able leadership and if a captain is successful in one format he could be successful in all three."

Posted in

Suhail Rizwan
0

Full name Mohammad Javed Miandad Khan

Born June 12, 1957, Karachi, Sind

Current age 52 years 354 days

Major teams Pakistan, Glamorgan, Habib Bank Limited, Karachi, Sind, Sussex

Batting style Right-hand bat

Bowling style Legbreak googly

Relation Brother - Bashir Miandad, Brother - Anwar Miandad, Brother - Sohail Miandad, Nephew - Faisal Iqbal

Mohammad Javed Miandad Khan
Batting and fielding averages

Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 6s Ct St
Tests 124 189 21 8832 280* 52.57

23 43 48 93 1
ODIs 233 218 41 7381 119* 41.70 11014 67.01 8 50
71 2
First-class 402 632 95 28663 311 53.37

80 139
340 3
List A 306 281 59 9614 152* 43.30

12 64
103 2
Bowling averages

Mat Inns Balls Runs Wkts BBI BBM Ave Econ SR 4w 5w 10
Tests 124 36 1470 682 17 3/74 5/94 40.11 2.78 86.4 0 0 0
ODIs 233 12 436 297 7 2/22 2/22 42.42 4.08 62.2 0 0 0
First-class 402
12688 6507 191 7/39
34.06 3.07 66.4
6 0
List A 306
688 497 15 3/20 3/20 33.13 4.33 45.8 0 0 0
Career statistics
Test debut Pakistan v New Zealand at Lahore, Oct 9-13, 1976 scorecard
Last Test Pakistan v Zimbabwe at Lahore, Dec 16-21, 1993 scorecard
Test statistics
ODI debut Pakistan v West Indies at Birmingham, Jun 11, 1975 scorecard
Last ODI India v Pakistan at Bangalore, Mar 9, 1996 scorecard
ODI statistics
First-class span 1973/74 - 1993/94
List A span 1975 - 1997/98
Profile

Javed Miandad is the greatest batsman Pakistan has ever produced. There was little doubt in the mind of Abdul Hafeez Kardar, Pakistan's first Test captain and influential administrator, when he first laid eyes on him as a youngster in the early 70s and famously predicted Miandad "the find of the decade." He wasn't wrong, as a stupendous debut series against New Zealand in 1976 started to prove.

  • Read More

Profile

His immense batting talent and a very sharp cricketing mind has made Javed Miandad Pakistan`s most valuable batsman. Start- ing with a scintillating century on debut against New Zealand at Lahore at age 19, Javed`s Test batting average never dropped below fifty throughout his 20 year career. Javed is by far Pakistan`s most experienced Test player, and most prol- ific run- getter - 8832 Test runs at 52.57.

Posted in

Suhail Rizwan
0

And so finally, 10 men, six categories and 198 Test players come together to produce one all-time Pakistan XI.

It wasn't, on final balance, as difficult a task as it may have initially appeared. As Imran Khan shines the ball, England v Pakistan, 5th Test, 4th day, August 10, 1987many as four players were unanimous picks: Imran Khan, Javed Miandad, Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis would in all likelihood be among the top contenders on any such global list. Two more batting greats, Hanif Mohammad and Inzamam-ul-Haq, were near-unanimous selections, with nine votes each. And with Abdul Qadir picking up eight votes as the sole spinner, it means as many as seven of an all-time Pakistan XI pick themselves.

Pleasingly perhaps, the XI takes in players from all eras, recognition of the prolific ability of the land to keep producing talent no matter the circumstances of the time and era: Hanif Mohammad and Fazal Mahmood from the 50s and 60s, Zaheer Abbas, Miandad, Imran and Qadir from the 70s through to the early 90s, and the rest from the mid-80s onwards. Tellingly, given how Pakistan have fared this last decade, the latest Test debutant is Rashid Latif (1992). The choice of Latif, in fact, wasn't a straightforward one; his greater batting ability tips the scales in his favour.

Finally, a word about the shape of the line-up. Pakistan have been at their best when they have played attacking, aggressive cricket, Almost exclusively, that has come from the nature of their bowling attack, which is why the all-time XI has a four-man bowling attack and Imran Khan.

Some might argue that another specialist middle-order batsman should have been in the line-up, but the selection assumes picking players at the peak of their skills. So Imran's naturally solid technique provides a robust enough presence at six, around which the line-up pivots. Latif and Akram below him add up to almost another batsman.

That leaves the bowling attack to be as spectacular as any that can be conceived. Just imagine a four-man fast-bowling attack of the variety, skill and pace of this one: Imran, Fazal, Wasim and Waqar. With Qadir backing up, there is enough wicket-taking threat here to trouble any batting side, on any surface, from any era.

Posted in

Suhail Rizwan
0

The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has announced the itinerary of the 'home' seriesLast-minute preparations to the pitch ahead of the opening game, Abu Dhabi, May 17, 2007 in the UAE against South Africa in October and November this year. The series will be shared between the Sheikh Zayed Stadium in Abu Dhabi and the Dubai International Cricket Stadium; the two grounds will join Sharjah, which has hosted Pakistan in the past, as Test venues in the UAE. The series will feature two Tests, five ODIs and a Twenty20 international.

Cricket South Africa had agreed to the PCB's proposal of playing a series on neutral ground, back in April. The PCB even explored the possibility of playing matches in Sharjah, but have decided to restrict it to two venues. Abu Dhabi and Dubai have hosted one-dayers and Twenty20s but never staged a Test.

" I am very grateful to Dr. Mtutuzeli Nyoka (CSA president) and Gerald Majola for their understanding of our position and supporting us to make this even possible," PCB chairman Ijaz Butt said. "I would like to especially thank the Emirates Cricket Board for their unwavering support to Pakistan Cricket."

Pakistan has not hosted an international series since the Lahore attacks in March last year, and was stripped of its rights to host the 2011 World Cup as a result of the volatile security situation in the country. The UAE, with strong links to Pakistan cricket, emerged as an alternate 'host' and Pakistan have played ODI series against Australia and New Zealand in Dubai and Abu Dhabi since last year. Pakistan also played a 'home' Test series against New Zealand late last year, and will also 'host' England and Australia in England later this summer.

Schedule:

Oct 27: Only Twenty20, Abu Dhabi
Oct 29: 1st ODI, Abu Dhabi
Oct 31: 2nd ODI, Abu Dhabi
Nov 2: 3rd ODI, Dubai
Nov 5: 4th ODI, Dubai
Nov 8: 5th ODI, Dubai
Nov 12-16: 1st Test, Dubai
Nov 20-24: 2nd Test, Abu Dhabi

Posted in

Suhail Rizwan
0

Former Pakistan players, Aamer Sohail and Abdul Qadir, have criticised the decision taken by arbitrator Irfan Qadir to overturn Shoaib Malik's one-year ban and cut his fine by half. Speculation in Pakistan has suggested that political pressure was brought to bear on the Sania Mirza and Shoaib Malik arrive for a promotional event, Mumbai, April 30, 2010PCB regarding Malik's ban.

"By lifting the ban on Malik, the PCB has succumbed to political pressures," Qadir, a former chief selector, said. "If the board had taken a strong decision, it should have stuck to it come what may, but their decision will now encourage the players to violate discipline and get away with it."

Since Malik had been pardoned, Qadir said, the PCB would have to do the same with the other players. "Now it's the duty of the board to clear other players also because it will be blamed to have done preferential treatment to one player after Malik is cleared," he said.

Sohail called the decision a "hasty" one. "To hide its own incompetence, the PCB targeted the players and, after pressures from outside, they abruptly lifted the ban."

The PCB had banned Younis Khan and Mohammad Yousuf, from playing for Pakistan in any format for an indefinite period, while handing out one-year bans to Malik and Rana Naved-ul-Hasan following the team's disastrous tour of Australia in 2009-10. Shahid Afridi and the Akmal brothers were fined Rs 2-3 million [$24,000-35,000] for various misdemeanours and put on six-month probations.

The charge against Malik was never clearly explained by the inquiry committee that decided on the punishment but it was widely thought to be for what a number of management officials and players called his negative influence on the side. This was confirmed in a subsequently leaked video of the inquiry committee meetings, in which Malik's role within the squad was blasted by a number of players including Afridi and Yousuf.

Sarfraz Nawaz, a former fast bowler, was scathing in his criticism of the PCB, saying it had taken "a coward's stance". "It's a decision taken under political pressure and will damage Pakistan cricket in the future," he said. "PCB took a decision against discipline breaches but couldn't stand the pressure from political forces. I also question the authority of the arbitrator as well who doesn't have the credibility and authority to take such a decision."

All of the punished players, apart from the retired Yousuf, had appealed against their bans and fines and will have hearings in June. Younis' appeal was scheduled to be heard immediately after Malik's but it was pushed back to June 5, while Naved-ul-Hasan's hearing was set for June 19. However, Iqbal Mohammad Ali, the head of parliament's sports committee, felt the delays were a deliberate attempt to keep them out of the Asia Cup in June.

"I believe the only reason in delaying the appeals of these two players is that the PCB does not want to include their names in the Asia Cup squad," Ali told AP. "He [arbitrator] should have given decisions on all the six appeals yesterday, but he just lifted ban from Shoaib Malik and reduced the fine.

"It surprised me that they kept only Malik under observation. PCB should treat all the players equally. If they had decided to lift the ban on Malik and reduce the fine, they should have taken the similar decision on all the players."

Posted in

Suhail Rizwan
0

BBC cricket correspondent Jonathan Agnew
By Jonathan Agnew
BBC cricket correspondent, Lord's

The first Test at Lord's between England and Bangladesh was a good game of cricket, only ending at tea on the final day.

People will look back in years to come and say it was a resounding win for England, which technically it was as they won by eight wickets, but England have lots to think about.

Apart from Steve Finn the rest of the bowling attack was below par.

You can take Graeme Swann out of the equation because the pitch did nothing for him but James Anderson and Tim Bresnan had disappointing games.

Either the selectors will hope Anderson gets his rhythm back - and there were signs of it in this match - or consider a change to five bowlers.

I don't consider Bresnan a Test opening bowler. I think he was flattered to be given the new ball in both innings.

I don't see him having enough in a four-man attack, to me he is a second change seamer.

England will manage Finn carefully but with great optimism.

He has such a good action, a very good temperament and seems a calm thinking, intelligent, feet on the ground sort of a lad.

I think he's very promising, he'll cope with the pressure and hardly bowls a bad ball. I think the only time he got cut in the match led to a wicket with a catch at point! But for a 21-year-old he showed tremendous accuracy.

England celebrate another Steve Finn wicket
Finn caused Bangladesh problems on his home debut

I thought he bowled a fraction too full which is an unusual criticism, but I'd like to see him drop his length just a little bit to make use of his height and bounce.

At 6ft 7ins, he's almost as tall as Joel Garner! Joel was not out and out fast but could use the conditions magnificently.

Some are nervous but Finn was calm, unruffled and phlegmatic and he looked like he belonged. I think he'll go a long way.

I wouldn't be worried about Swann though. The batsmen got after him and he conceded some runs so couldn't settle, which puts pressure on the other bowlers.

It was a good tactic by Bangladesh, but there was nothing in this pitch for Swann and I'm sure he will come back well in the second Test at Old Trafford, which starts on Friday.

I like the look of Eoin Morgan. His dismissal was a typical left-hander's one to a ball down the hill at Lord's on off-stump but he's busy, played his natural game, he can adapt to situations read them and respond and that's why he was picked.

I don't see any reason why he shouldn't play in the Ashes, I think he's got a very good chance. I was talking about him playing in Tests at the end of the Twenty20 because I can see what the selectors would like in him.

Jonathan Trott batted very well for his double century but this scratching around at the crease is worrying.

I can't see him being allowed to carry on like that. It's a very unusual sort of phobia and he seems to be in his own little world.

He's going to be involved in as many run outs as Geoffrey Boycott! Unless he stops this very strange almost obsession, teams will learn how to distract him.

I would love to know what goes on in his mind but the coaches and psycho-analysts have got to help him sort it out because he can become an even better player and even more difficult to get out.

I think Shane Warne would have destroyed him with his sledging and driven him to distraction.

Bangladesh were much better than a lot of people thought they were going to be.

606: DEBATE
Hobbsy

Their fightback was somewhat unusual but it was great.

Tamim Iqbal's shot selection was a bit curious at times, not many opening batsmen following on go out and score a hundred off 100 balls.

If he wants a long career, especially away from Bangladesh, he's going to have to tighten up a bit.

Hard hitting left-handed openers have been very successful, players like Chris Gayle, Matthew Hayden and Adam Gilchrist.

They are very difficult to bowl at, they hit the ball all over the place and it's very difficult to set fields to them.

Tamim has all the talent and there is no need to play the silly shots. He feeds on width to hit over cover, point or the slips and so he doesn't need to go swiping at a straight ball.

Bangladesh's bowling was not up to county standard at times though. They have defensive fields with men spread all over the place, even when a new batsman comes in, because they can't bowl the ball in the right places for long enough.

Until they unearth some quality strike bowlers they will struggle. Shahadat Hossain was willing and tall and bowled with some aggression, but he can't do it on his own.

Pretty little spinners are all very well but they are pretty ineffective away from Bangladesh.

Meanwhile it was a lovely idea to let spectators onto the outfield during the lunch interval. I saw people kissing the turf.

I hope they do it more often. I know it will be impossible to have 29,000 wandering about but I hope people that came today go away with great memories of a great cricket ground and will come back.

The Marylebone Cricket Club is not full of the crusty old fuddy duddies that some people think, it's a great club with a wonderful ground and chief executive Keith Bradshaw deserves huge credit.

Posted in

Suhail Rizwan
0

Harsha Bhogle: Welcome to Time Out. We are looking at cricket in the United States today, and we're delighted to have Don Lockerbie, who is the CEO of USACA, talking to us about the trials and tribulations, and all the joys and frustrations, of taking cricket over there. I am also going to talk to Jamie Alter on the show, who is probably known to a lot of people as a byline on Cricinfo. Then we will get Haroon Lorgat, CEO of the ICC, on why the United States is such a hot destination for cricket, and finally the numbers game with S Rajesh.

HB: Don, first international cricket in the US - Sri Lanka playing New Zealand in a couple of Twenty20 internationals. Is that the start of something big?

Don Lockerbie: Absolutely. We have been working on our Destination USA programme since I took on the role of CEO of US cricket in April 2009. We have been very diligent about the entire concept of bringing in the best players and best teams in the world to the United States so that we can showcase cricket at the highest level and start to ignite what we think will be a big movement of cricket here.

HB: We have seen the US national team play in tournaments before, but do you look at the US as a playing destination or as a staging destination: that the teams will come there and play, not as much as homegrown players trying to make big on the world stage?

DL: No, it's both. We have three major initiatives that we have been working on. Destination USA is the first one, the one that will help us tell a compelling story about US cricket to the rest of the world. With 15 million hungry cricket fans residing in the United States and about another five million in Canada, and about two-three million in the West Indies, we are surrounded by nearly 20 million cricket fans, and we believe that that market wants to see the best players in the world play. That is our Destination USA programme.

We also have a programme called Project 15. It's an attempt to get the United States into the 2015 World Cup, and to do that we certainly have to be in the top 15 or better in the world.

And that means we have to win matches, we've got to improve, we've got to develop players, we've got to have training programmes, we've got to have national programmes. That is our second initiative.

The third initiative is "American Cricket", and that's an attempt to get our cricket into schools. To develop our youth programme, to introduce the sport to very good athletes who might not have been growing up with cricket in their home. For sports like baseball and softball for women, in the United States people get scholarships and try to become pro, and there are plenty who are not going to make it to professional and collegiate level. We believe that there are tens and thousands of very qualified athletes who can learn the game and would love to be professional cricketers one day.

HB: Twenty million is a lot of people, and I guess a lot of them eat curry and have accents like mine.

DL: Well, they do, but there is no question that it's only seven or eight percent of the population. We have got a lot more people we can introduce the game to. We are certainly thrilled with the fact that over the last few decades Commonwealth countries residents have moved to the United States, they have brought their culture, they have brought their heritage, and one of those pieces of the pie would be their love for cricket. And they have certainly kept it growing with their American-born children. At the same time we are finding that the growth of the game is creating a new wave of interest. We have over 1000 cricket clubs in the United States, we have 30,000 active members of USA cricket, and we estimate that there are 200,000 players recreationally on a given weekend in the United States. So it's growing, and right now we are more of an underground sport. We are working to get us at the grassroots and then someday in the mainstream.

HB: We mustn't let our friends in Australia and New Zealand hear those numbers, because when you say 20 million people following cricket, that's more than the two of them together can rustle up.

DL: Well, the US is a large country, and that also makes it difficult for us. For a lot of the things that the ICC expects us to do for the sport, it means that we need much more in the way of resources. There are some countries who can visit all their cricket fields before noon in a day. Perhaps, like India, it takes us several weeks or months [laughs].

HB: I know. Jamie studied in the US, and knows the pressures of trying to play cricket in the US. There are three things that Don talked about; the third of those was getting in the schools. Jamie, you see that as the biggest challenge?

Jamie Alter: I think that's the major challenge, the game there is still sort of seen as an elitist sport by the Americans. I am speaking from my own personal experience, when I was there in college and working there as well. It's played largely by the expats, so the biggest challenge is: how do you get it into the American schools and into that American demographic.

HB: Is it a bit like Netherland (the book by Joseph O'Neill), where you have to scramble around for whatever space you get and play? Was it like that when you were playing at college?

JA: I read the book a few years ago, and it was exactly how it was for us. You basically have to wait till someone is done with their Ultimate Frisbee game or their lacrosse game, or in somebody else's baseball lot. So again, space obviously is a problem, because it's a game which is foreign to the Americans. So it will be a big challenge to find grounds that are open for everyone to play in.

HB: Don, do you see the arrival of playing leagues in the USA, a bit like what football did in the 70s? You have the Peles and Cruyffs coming and playing in the US. Do you see people coming up and maybe playing cricket for the professional teams in the US?

DL: No question. In fact, we are well underway in a planning situation wherein we are working towards professionalisation of cricket in the United States to begin with. We are very diligent right now and working towards equalising what some of the other Associate nations like Ireland, Scotland, Holland and Canada have been able to do recently; beginning to put some of their players on professional retainers, and some of these players are now travelling and playing all over the world and getting IPL opportunities. We need to do that in the United States, and along with that will come a professional league.

I have spent a lot of years in American soccer. There is history there, and the strategies that were employed. When you actually think about it, our Destination USA programme and our Project 15 programme are not that original, when you look at what US soccer has done.

Yes, in the 1970s, the North American soccer league was Pele and Beckenbauer and other prominent players. It was a wonderful opportunity but it died. In 1994 the soccer World Cup took place, and it generated great interest in the sport and it was followed by Major League Soccer, which started in 1996. We are looking to do that too. We would love for the ICC to look at the United States in the future for some ICC events.

We are looking to bring in the best teams in the world. I will give you an another example - 14 years after Major League Soccer started in the United States, they are averaging 14,000, 17,000, 18,000 people to a match, which isn't too bad.

HB: I think we should get more with cricket. I mean, with all those Indians starved of cricket there…

DL: My point is that that's what they average on a night, on a daily night in their league. But when Barcelona comes to play Manchester United in Philadelphia they have 90,000. Why is that? When Mexico plays the United States, they can get 100,000 at the Rose Bowl. So the point is that soccer has a good history now of being positive, the US team is at the World Cup starting in less than two weeks.

So it's all moving in the right direction. So by bringing in Destination USA, events, and what we think was a successful Sri Lanka-New Zealand series, we start that way. And then also work towards a professional league and professionalising our players with national coaching programmes… these are the kind of things that will work.

One more thing that I would like to say is that the city of New York in their public school leagues, even going back to the book Netherland, now has 28 schools playing varsity high-school cricket with over a million-dollar-a-year budget. And that's our success story right now. Twenty-eight schools have made it a varsity sport, as opposed to 22 a year ago.

HB: It's good to hear. I thought US cricket lost out a great deal in the early days because they couldn't figure out whether it was to be called cricket association, cricket board or federation; and they did what lot of us do - they started fighting first.

But Jamie, when you were there did you have to explain to the Americans just what this game is? Why does the ball hit the ground? Why doesn't it curve in the air? Why don't they play with one mitt on?

JA: Honestly Harsha, I probably spent more time trying to give answers to the guys on the field, when I wasn't batting or when my team was batting, because they just couldn't get it.

I remember there were two guys who were playing varsity baseball, I knew them. So I got them to practise with us. They had their fielding down pat. They had all of us looking like fools in the fielding department. Obviously, they couldn't get the bowling down at all. The batting, as soon as you bowled them a full toss, the ball was in the next state. But obviously when you pitched the ball down on a length, they had problems there. I don't know how much that has changed since I was there five years ago.

HB: Good question to ask, Don. Do you still have to dig at puzzled looks when you see these guys in whites banging the ball down on the turf?

DL: I think the fact of the matter is that it is a curiosity to a lot of people, and yet now we have about 500 cricket grounds in the United States. Some on them may just be an artificial strip somewhere in a public park. But we have counted over 500, and that's an average of 10 per state. Certainly a lot of states like New York, California, Florida will have a lot more than the average. The fact is that people are seeing the game being played, and surely what we need to do is that we need to make sure that the cricketers are doing what Jamie was doing, and that's inviting their American friends to come play, try it out and see if they can learn the game. And not to worry about the heritage fiefdom that we have, or groups who basically close the door on anybody else and just play with friends and colleagues and families. I think that is the secret.

So my job is to really continue the exposure, and for me the exposure is going to be to get it into the schools, create youth academies, which are also happening, popping out all over the United States. We have a group out of the Atlanta area, which is already working with, reportedly, 10,000 kids in Atlanta schools and teaching it almost as a public physical-education curriculum. Then kids who are interested go the academies, if they find the sport interesting.

Posted in